Image by Richard Wheeler, used with permission
Z-DNA is a little thinner, and the backbone of each strand of the double helix (in red and orange above, and in hematite below) isn't a smooth, ribbon-like path. Rather, Z-DNA has a jagged backbone that zigzags with each pair of bases up and down the double helix. Its major and minor grooves are also less pronounced than in B-DNA. Z-DNA forms rarely in biology, and is generally found in DNA with a specific sequence; in this case, alternating pyrimidine-purine sequences, such as CGCGCGCGCG.
With some tinkering, I was able to create a Z-DNA version of my beaded PI-MtuI sequence. The original B-DNA version is on the right, and the new Z-DNA version is on the left:
To create this version, I first worked up the design using my own variations on Gwen's pattern, but when it came time to peyote stitch up and down the backbones of each strand (at about the 7 minute mark in the pattern), I added two 11° seed beads where I would have added one 8° seed bead. Then I zipped up and down the backbones once more, adding a 15° seed bead at the same place as the 11° seed beads, alternating its placement on either side of the 11° beads so that the backbones zig zag:
The resulting structure is more flexible than the B-DNA version, and not as aesthetically pleasing either, but it remarkably mimics the appearance of Z-DNA. You can even see how the major and minor grooves are less pronounced, and how there are fewer base pairs per turn in this version:
Other forms of DNA exist in biology as well, such as the Y-shaped junctions formed during DNA replication, and the very cool Holliday junctions created during meiosis and in some kinds of DNA repair. However, those structures will have to be topics for another blog post.
Thanks for sharing this. I never knew there were so many different kinds of DNA. I love the groves of the B version. So pleasing!
ReplyDeleteThanks Gwen! I prefer the B-DNA version too, but it was awesome to figure out that your design works for all sorts of versions of DNA!
ReplyDelete